<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The alliance against Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/</link>
	<description>Anand Hariharan V</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Superman</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Superman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Napoleon Bonaparte (Bone apart?) cannot be compared with any one - Churchill, Roosevelt, Subash Bose or Samurai and more, historical heroes. History would suggest that Napaoleon belonged to a league of his own.

Napoleon would sleep in the midst of a battle for a few minutes (Well it’s not sleep – but deep meditation). This makes the body and mind fresh to be ready for fresh attacks or plan and destroy enemy by a new, cunning and effective method.

But present day CEO&#039;s have valour, bravery and brain for what? Become big in terms of money power? They need not have the best swords, cannons, horses, arrows and infantry. They only need a pool of outsourced clever people from other countries and bargaining brainpower to be in the market or throw others out of the market. No muscle power. Only crude intelligence and political amendments.

So back to the topic - this battle is new one. This Google vs XYZ is a unique one.

Windows are good. Sure other doors will be shut ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napoleon Bonaparte (Bone apart?) cannot be compared with any one &#8211; Churchill, Roosevelt, Subash Bose or Samurai and more, historical heroes. History would suggest that Napaoleon belonged to a league of his own.</p>
<p>Napoleon would sleep in the midst of a battle for a few minutes (Well it’s not sleep – but deep meditation). This makes the body and mind fresh to be ready for fresh attacks or plan and destroy enemy by a new, cunning and effective method.</p>
<p>But present day CEO&#8217;s have valour, bravery and brain for what? Become big in terms of money power? They need not have the best swords, cannons, horses, arrows and infantry. They only need a pool of outsourced clever people from other countries and bargaining brainpower to be in the market or throw others out of the market. No muscle power. Only crude intelligence and political amendments.</p>
<p>So back to the topic &#8211; this battle is new one. This Google vs XYZ is a unique one.</p>
<p>Windows are good. Sure other doors will be shut ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanand</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>vanand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Believe me! I&#039;ve seen that list before and spent timeless discussions with others within and outside MSFT about how good/bad/credible is that list.

Yes, GMail and Mac OS X are on top of that list- but who uses them :)

And yes, IMO-Gmail still sucks - it might use AJAX effectively and Microsoft may try and use it as an example for illustrating AJAX usage - but to me, it still sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me! I&#8217;ve seen that list before and spent timeless discussions with others within and outside MSFT about how good/bad/credible is that list.</p>
<p>Yes, GMail and Mac OS X are on top of that list- but who uses them :)</p>
<p>And yes, IMO-Gmail still sucks &#8211; it might use AJAX effectively and Microsoft may try and use it as an example for illustrating AJAX usage &#8211; but to me, it still sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>see my reply!
http://momentlogs.com/arun/2006/08/21/google-a-rising-power-or-a-humble-innovator/#3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see my reply!<br />
<a href="http://momentlogs.com/arun/2006/08/21/google-a-rising-power-or-a-humble-innovator/#3" rel="nofollow">http://momentlogs.com/arun/2006/08/21/google-a-rising-power-or-a-humble-innovator/#3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanand</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>vanand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s market cap is $80 billion. The last fraud suit against Google was settled by paying off $90 million.

Now, let&#039;s wake up - its not a new-kid-on-the-block-anymore. Neither Google nor search is in &quot;infancy&quot; or anything close to soemthing like that. 

The war is &lt;b&gt;ON&lt;/b&gt; and Google is up to it. 

It&#039;s all good for Microsoft and Yahoo in a way, cos they have been shown by Google as to how much money they can make out of search - they have learnt their lessons and getting more and more serious everyday. In fact, Microsoft has always been a company that&#039;s taken competition head-on and fight it hard. It was the  OpenSource threat that made them make Windows Server better and now it&#039;s giving a hard competition fighting the enterprise server market with Sun, IBM and Red Hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s market cap is $80 billion. The last fraud suit against Google was settled by paying off $90 million.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s wake up &#8211; its not a new-kid-on-the-block-anymore. Neither Google nor search is in &#8220;infancy&#8221; or anything close to soemthing like that. </p>
<p>The war is <b>ON</b> and Google is up to it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all good for Microsoft and Yahoo in a way, cos they have been shown by Google as to how much money they can make out of search &#8211; they have learnt their lessons and getting more and more serious everyday. In fact, Microsoft has always been a company that&#8217;s taken competition head-on and fight it hard. It was the  OpenSource threat that made them make Windows Server better and now it&#8217;s giving a hard competition fighting the enterprise server market with Sun, IBM and Red Hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>The search industry, despite its revenue and stature today, is still in its infancy. While google does have a good headstart, others do have enough resources to play the game and be in it for the long run. Maybe, rather than the consolidation we see in the chart today, there will be a lot of fragmentation in future in favour of niche search services which would cater to demands of specific sections of the netizenry. Blog on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The search industry, despite its revenue and stature today, is still in its infancy. While google does have a good headstart, others do have enough resources to play the game and be in it for the long run. Maybe, rather than the consolidation we see in the chart today, there will be a lot of fragmentation in future in favour of niche search services which would cater to demands of specific sections of the netizenry. Blog on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanand</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>vanand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Now, what can I say about this :)

&lt;b&gt;Google execs are in a selling spree giving up about 23million shares in total on Aug 9th. Not only this it is remarkable that not a single Google insider has bought a single share of the company in the 18 months&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;As of Aug. 9, they had sold almost 23 million shares. That means Google’s top executives have offloaded about $7.4 billion of stock, equal to about a third of the company’s starting market value when it sold shares at $85 each in the August 2004 IPO.

There would be nothing evil about the people who built Google into a $119 billion company parlaying their squarely gotten gains into McMansions, private jets, home cinemas, Aspen ski-lodges, or whatever else the financially well-endowed are conspicuously consuming. Diversification is divine; they deserve every cent.

Nevertheless, it is remarkable that not a single Google insider has bought a single share of the company in the 18 months since the IPO lock-ups expired, according to data compiled by Bloomberg from the Washington Service, which tracks insider sales. Philip Remek at Guzman &amp; Co. in Coral Gables, Florida, is still the only equity analyst with a “sell&#039;’ rating on Google; you could argue that he’s not such a lone wolf, given the behavior of the company’s owners. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reported &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2006/08/18/google-exec-stock-sales-74-billion-and-counting/trackback/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, what can I say about this :)</p>
<p><b>Google execs are in a selling spree giving up about 23million shares in total on Aug 9th. Not only this it is remarkable that not a single Google insider has bought a single share of the company in the 18 months</b></p>
<blockquote><p>As of Aug. 9, they had sold almost 23 million shares. That means Google’s top executives have offloaded about $7.4 billion of stock, equal to about a third of the company’s starting market value when it sold shares at $85 each in the August 2004 IPO.</p>
<p>There would be nothing evil about the people who built Google into a $119 billion company parlaying their squarely gotten gains into McMansions, private jets, home cinemas, Aspen ski-lodges, or whatever else the financially well-endowed are conspicuously consuming. Diversification is divine; they deserve every cent.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it is remarkable that not a single Google insider has bought a single share of the company in the 18 months since the IPO lock-ups expired, according to data compiled by Bloomberg from the Washington Service, which tracks insider sales. Philip Remek at Guzman &amp; Co. in Coral Gables, Florida, is still the only equity analyst with a “sell&#8217;’ rating on Google; you could argue that he’s not such a lone wolf, given the behavior of the company’s owners. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reported <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2006/08/18/google-exec-stock-sales-74-billion-and-counting/trackback/" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanand</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>vanand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>@arun - i work for Microsoft and Yes the passions here are high when it comes to fighting competition. I don&#039;t see anything wrong about it though! 

IMO - GMail sucks and the number of subscribers for GMail compared to Yahoo! and Hotmail proves me right. In fact, none of the Google creations were as successful as Google Search. They are trying hard by buying out many new ideas from startups and small firms, but as of now - its all about Search and nothing more.

And the &quot;killing&quot; part kicks in probably because of the &lt;b&gt;&quot;Do not evil&quot;&lt;/b&gt; motto of Google :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@arun &#8211; i work for Microsoft and Yes the passions here are high when it comes to fighting competition. I don&#8217;t see anything wrong about it though! </p>
<p>IMO &#8211; GMail sucks and the number of subscribers for GMail compared to Yahoo! and Hotmail proves me right. In fact, none of the Google creations were as successful as Google Search. They are trying hard by buying out many new ideas from startups and small firms, but as of now &#8211; its all about Search and nothing more.</p>
<p>And the &#8220;killing&#8221; part kicks in probably because of the <b>&#8220;Do not evil&#8221;</b> motto of Google :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vibhor</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>vibhor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>hi anand,
hey nice blog of urs..n ya agree with you wordpress has more feature than window live...
and ur article abt the compitition of the top most search engine and its compititors is very well intresting...
looking forward more of ur post ..

take care..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi anand,<br />
hey nice blog of urs..n ya agree with you wordpress has more feature than window live&#8230;<br />
and ur article abt the compitition of the top most search engine and its compititors is very well intresting&#8230;<br />
looking forward more of ur post ..</p>
<p>take care..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applied imagination &#187; Google - a rising power or a humble innovator?</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>applied imagination &#187; Google - a rising power or a humble innovator?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] I was reading my friend&#8217;s post titled &#8220;The alliance against Google&#8221; It&#8217;s kind of weird &#8216;cos we&#8217;ve been close friends since high school and our aspirations are similar, but on this one topic we always&#160;seem to be&#160;on the opposite ends. Anyways I do not want to digress from what I wanted to write. I really do not see the point why the whole word (whole world in my dictionary is the software industry  ) is up and against Google. Why cant people simply accept the fact that Google is growing up? Yes it is a competitor to Yahoo!, eBay, Microsoft but why doesnt the clans that worship these companies take up the competition in true spirit? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was reading my friend&#8217;s post titled &#8220;The alliance against Google&#8221; It&#8217;s kind of weird &#8216;cos we&#8217;ve been close friends since high school and our aspirations are similar, but on this one topic we always&nbsp;seem to be&nbsp;on the opposite ends. Anyways I do not want to digress from what I wanted to write. I really do not see the point why the whole word (whole world in my dictionary is the software industry  ) is up and against Google. Why cant people simply accept the fact that Google is growing up? Yes it is a competitor to Yahoo!, eBay, Microsoft but why doesnt the clans that worship these companies take up the competition in true spirit? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haribalan r</title>
		<link>http://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>haribalan r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vanand.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/the-alliance-against-google/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Good one dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
